Australia’s new under-16 social media ban is proving less effective than anticipated. Just days after the legislation took effect, many teenagers continue accessing platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and Facebook despite the restrictions. While some younger users have been locked out of accounts, others have found workarounds to maintain their social media presence, creating significant compliance challenges for the government’s ambitious policy.
Government Acknowledges Gradual Implementation
Australian authorities recognize that the enforcement process will take time. Communications Minister Anika Wells stated that age assurance verification “may require several days or even weeks to complete fairly and accurately.” The government is relying on hefty fines—up to $50 million per violation—to pressure platforms into stricter compliance over time. However, this gradual approach contrasts sharply with initial expectations of a swift crackdown on youth social media access.
Legal Challenges Mount Against the Ban
The policy is already facing significant opposition in the High Court. Reddit has challenged the ban’s legality, while several Australian teenagers have mounted their own constitutional challenge, arguing the restrictions interfere with free political communication. These cases highlight growing concerns about the blanket approach, especially given conflicting research on social media’s actual impact on young people.
Experts and academics suggest digital literacy education offers a more balanced alternative that acknowledges social media’s role in modern connection while teaching responsible usage. Meanwhile, the government reports a surge in downloads of alternative social media apps, suggesting teenagers are simply shifting platforms rather than abandoning online engagement entirely.
The effectiveness of Australia’s experiment will have global implications, as other countries consider similar restrictions.